/
Coating under the microscope: one truck, two coating stories

Coating under the microscope: one truck, two coating stories

Special applications place special demands on a coating. In this series we put the coating of everyday products, objects and structures under the microscope. This time the pallet box under a truck: apart from one area of damage, the box itself is still in good condition, but the support behind it has rusted almost completely. A salt spray test to ISO 9227 and a stone chip test would have exposed this difference straight away.
Vrachtwagen op de snelweg met een witte palletkist onder de oplegger

One truck, two coating stories

Would the owner be happy with this? That is the question we ask ourselves about every product we come across. In this series we put the coating of a wide range of products, objects and structures under the microscope. This time: the pallet box under a truck. A good example of how special applications place special demands on a coating.

Truck on the motorway with a white pallet box under the trailer

From a distance: rust at the rear

Pallet boxes under trucks take a real beating, both mechanically and from the environment. With this truck, too, it is noticeable even from a distance that there is rust at the rear of the pallet box.

Side view of the pallet box: the coating is in good condition, only the support at the rear is rusting

On closer inspection: a big difference between the two parts

The large part, the pallet box itself, is still in good condition apart from one area of damage. The rear section, on the other hand, has rusted almost completely. We took a closer look at both parts.

Mechanical damage to the bottom right corner of the pallet box without red rust, next to the rusted support

1. Pallet box itself: no defects (in order)

Observation: the coating of the pallet box itself is in good condition. There are no visible signs of corrosion or other defects. There is, however, mechanical damage on the bottom right-hand side, where something has probably hit the box. Although the steel has torn there, there is no corrosion.

Consequence: of course we do not know how long the damage has been there, but so far the coating around the scratch is not flaking off.

Cause: this suggests that the pretreatment was probably carried out properly. The zinc under the coating is preventing red rust from forming (for the time being).

Support behind the pallet box with flaking coating and red rust starting at the edges

2. Rear section: severe rust formation and flaking (defect)

Observation: behind the pallet box there is a support or bracket that, by contrast, has been severely attacked by corrosion.

Consequence: the coating is coming loose and red rust is visible directly underneath. As a result, the rear section has rusted almost completely.

Cause: red rust is visible straight away, so no galvanised steel was used. The corrosion starts at the edges, which points to edges that were not properly rounded. The fact that the rust is spreading so extensively under the coating probably indicates poor pretreatment and/or the absence of a primer.

Why was this part treated differently from the pallet box itself?

The support is probably a bought-in part, and the requirements for the coating were not clearly communicated. That is how one and the same truck tells two very different coating stories.

Who pays for that?

Many owners of these trucks will not accept this and will ask for repairs. That can turn into an enormous expense. But who is to blame? The truck body builder, or the supplier of the part?

That depends on what was agreed. Is there a clear paint specification, and does it say anything about this specific defect? Discussions like these often only start after years, at the moment coating defects become visible.

How could this have been prevented?

With clear agreements beforehand, and a test that confirms them. So when purchasing structures like this, and the parts that go with them, go through the following steps.

  • Specify. Set out in a paint specification what the coating has to meet: environment, expected service life, adhesion and corrosion protection. And share that specification with your supplier.
  • Test. Determine which loads the product will be exposed to (in this case the mechanical and environmental loads under a truck) and set out in the paint specification which tests will be used to assess the quality.
  • Verify. Check your requirements by actually carrying out those tests, on the product itself or a part of it, not on test panels. Only then can you see whether the system performs as you expect. In this case a salt spray test to ISO 9227 and a stone chip test would have exposed the problem straight away.

That is how you avoid discussions about quality and cost afterwards.

The art of specifying

What does your purchasing specification say about the coating? Coatings largely determine the service life of a product. Is that as clear to your supplier as it is to you?

We help companies to clarify these expectations, record them professionally and verify that they are met.

Want to prevent this on your product?

Define what your coating has to withstand with a CoatSpec specification.

Want to know your risk first? Take the Risk Scan

More from practice

  • Laborant in witte labjas bekijkt een rood testpaneel bij de zoutsproeikast met schuin opgestelde gecoate panelen

    8 October 2026

    Test explained: how well does your product resist rust?

  • Close-up van een zwarte pull-up bar met een verroeste bout en rode roest op de las

    8 October 2026

    Coating under the microscope: strong muscles, weak coating

  • Laborant met blauwe handschoenen plaatst een gecoat testpaneel in een tank met kunstmatig zeewater

    8 October 2026

    Test explained: what does cathodic protection do to the adhesion of your coating?